This is a print preview of this page

A printed page wil not show this message. Return to page.

Brownfield first policy

Our Green Belt Our Green Belt

CPRE first proposed Green Belts to stop urban sprawl.

The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the 2015 Conservative Manifesto clearly state that Ministers attach great importance to the Green Belt and will maintain existing levels of protection. The NPPF also states that Green Belt boundaries should only be changed in a Local Plan under “exceptional circumstances” and only permit most forms of development in “very special circumstances”. But local authorities continue to interpret these rules in a far more lax manner than they should.

Getting the facts straight

Critics of Green Belt policy tend to fall victim to one or more of the many Green Belt myths, such as that releasing Green Belt land is the answer to the housing crisis. There are several alternatives:

Strong protection for the Green Belt helps the economy by promoting urban regeneration and keeping housing and business close to services and transport links. In addition, as we have shown by the Our Green Belt campaign, large numbers of people use the Green Belt every day, often for activities as simple as enjoying an open view or walking the dog.

Poole & Bournemouth Green Belt as well as Wimborne, Verwood and Christchurch are under threat. We believe it is important to reuse previously developed brownfield land before building on greenfield, Dorset Heathlands and Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs).


© CPRE | Dorset CPRE, PO Box 9018, Dorchester, Dorset, DT1 9GY | Tel: 0333 577 0360, | Email:, | Web:
Registered charity number: 211974  | Privacy Policy